Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.


We are pleased to announce that beginning on Tuesday, March 25th, we are launching a new feedback experience for our customers!

The new experience should transition over seamlessly, but please be aware that short interruptions to our feedback portal may occur on March 25th between 2:30-4:30pm EDT.


All the best, your Optimizely Product Team

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 567

Full support for CMS language settings

It should be simple to get language behavior consistent with CMS language settings around fallback and replacement languages.
about 2 years ago in Optimizely Graph 0 Future consideration

DXP ability to amend app service access restrictions

To restrict environments by IP requires implementing something via code: https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/digital-experience-platform/docs/restricting-environment-access This is cumbersome, especially for IP ranges. In addition it's not poss...
5 months ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Infrastructure mgmt. 0 Future consideration

A more competitive price for the CMS license

As a customer I want to be able to pay a price to use the product that is reasonable and competitive compared to similar products so that I can choose Episerver CMS as platform instead of alternatives like Umbraco or Wordpress. Money I spend on li...
over 4 years ago in Content Management 2 Future consideration

Limit the number of workflows/briefs visible to different teams

Currently, every user has access to all active workflows and briefs in Welcome. However, we would like to restrict the visibility of workflows and briefs to specific users or teams. For instance, the content team should only see content-related wo...
almost 2 years ago in Content Marketing / Settings + Configuration 0 Future consideration

Deployment API Documentation

The deployment API documentation doesn't really cover real world scenarios. There are quick samples of a line of PowerShell, but really, that's now how anyone deploys. Deployments are done from a CI/CD server. So the build server has to create a p...
almost 2 years ago in Content Management / Content Manager 1 Future consideration

Make it possible to expand more than one level in CD API

As a developer I want to be able to expand more than one level in the Content Delivery API to be able to retrieve nested properties in content areas. When doing this, I want to be able to control the maximum number of levels to expand.
almost 2 years ago in Content Management / APIs 1 Future consideration

Adding closed caption files to videos in DAM

When uploading a video into the DAM now, you can't attached closed captioning to it, you have to upload those as separate (unrecognized) files and attach them in your own systems. As a goal to make videos as accessible as possible (and let's be ho...
almost 2 years ago in Content Marketing / DAM/Library 0 Future consideration

In-Progress Status for Work Requests

It's currently not possible to tell which requests have active work happening in tasks/campaigns based on existing statuses (accepted doesn't necessarily mean work is being done.) It would be great if we could have an in-progress status just like ...
over 2 years ago in Content Marketing / Requests 1 Future consideration

UI for managing items in the Graph

Super users and developers troubleshooting Graph content would get a lot of value from a tool to inspect and trim the actual graph entities in a way that's simpler and more intuitive than iGraphQL. Example scenarios Whitelist in CMS was updated an...
over 1 year ago in Optimizely Graph 0 Future consideration

Support OpenFeature

As a developer I want to be able to use an Optimizely provider for the CNCF OpenFeature project so that I don't have to learn a vendor-specific SDK to integrate my codebase with Optimizely resulting in faster adoption of Optimizely in my applications
over 1 year ago in Feature Experimentation / SDKs & Agent 0 Future consideration